2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
Davidlol - i agree with the sentiment but don't be so sure ;-)
"David C" <dlchase@.lifetimeinc.comwrote in message
news:%23CU57dqCIHA.5288@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Has anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster than
2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
>
David
>
seems the same. check your virus scan software, it can have a big impact.
-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
David C wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Has anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster than
2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
>
David
>
>
VS 2005 is, overall, pretty good on my machine. There are a couple of things
I have found that interfere:
1. Amount of memory on machine
2. Precompilation complete (on assemblies)? - If you are not constantly
adding additional patches/software, you can run a command line to complete
all of the ngening that normally runs in the background. Once complete,
things speed up.
3. Virus scanners - some really dog Visual Studio
Thus far, 2008 seems to have some of the same problems, so if you have one
of the above, you will likely find it slow, as well.
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
*************************************************
| Think outside the box!
|
*************************************************
"David C" <dlchase@.lifetimeinc.comwrote in message
news:%23CU57dqCIHA.5288@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Has anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster than
2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
>
David
>
I took my virus scanner out and it helped.
I have 1GB RAM and it is a fairly new PC.
No assemblies.
It just seems quite slow doing simple things and sometimes while it is
trying to do something my hard drive doesn't even flash but the page is
pretty slow to load initially. My projects are on the network and I have
1GB network connection. It would seem that things should be faster.
David
"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@.comcast.netNoSpamMwrote in
message news:%23rHYparCIHA.4236@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VS 2005 is, overall, pretty good on my machine. There are a couple of
things I have found that interfere:
>
1. Amount of memory on machine
2. Precompilation complete (on assemblies)? - If you are not constantly
adding additional patches/software, you can run a command line to complete
all of the ngening that normally runs in the background. Once complete,
things speed up.
3. Virus scanners - some really dog Visual Studio
>
Thus far, 2008 seems to have some of the same problems, so if you have one
of the above, you will likely find it slow, as well.
>
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
>
*************************************************
| Think outside the box! |
*************************************************
"David C" <dlchase@.lifetimeinc.comwrote in message
news:%23CU57dqCIHA.5288@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
>Has anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster than
>2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
>>
>David
>>
>
>
Hello David,
I found it more faster.
Are u experiensing some problems with VS 2008?
--
WBR,
Michael Nemtsev [.NET/C# MVP] :: blog: http://spaces.live.com/laflour
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we
miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it" (c) Michelangelo
DCHas anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster
DCthan 2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
DC>
DCDavid
DC>
Yes, the VS2005 designer was thrown away and replaced with a fast new one
that includes split screen (design & HTML view both visible & editable at
once).
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr,
MCSD, MVP, CSM, ASPInsider
http://SteveOrr.net
"David C" <dlchase@.lifetimeinc.comwrote in message
news:%23CU57dqCIHA.5288@.TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Has anybody used Visual Studio 2008 Beta yet? If so, is it faster than
2005? It sure can't be slower! What was MS thinking?
>
David
>
0 comments:
Post a Comment